Tuesday 1 March 2016

Aims and Context/ Reflective analysis



LINK TO MY SCRIPT (I DON'T WANT TO PRINT OFF WASTING PAPER IF I HAVE TO EDIT AND CHANGE IT)

Script:

https://www.celtx.com/auth/public/resource/a2z1tn91 



Aims and Context:

'Quick Shot'

  • Script 
  • Urban Story 
  • Target audience of 18-year-old, males
  • Film festival ( e.g. Toronto Urban Film Festival) 
  • Apply cinematography techniques developed for Urban Stories
  • As the writer, I took inspiration from Tarrantino's detailed description of characters, settings etc in particularly the 'Jackie Brown' script


Thea Barnes- Reflective Analysis

For my A2 Film coursework, I decided to create a screenplay within the Urban Story genre, focusing on two Latino characters, Paavo and Alonzo, whilst living within the poverty stricken areas of New York. I chose to focus on the opening scene of the movie, as I believe it allows the reader to clearly see that the socio-economic difficulty (dominant theme within Urban Stories) that is experienced in Alonzo and Paavo's everyday life. If I were to focus on a key scene during the middle of the film readers may not get the sense of entrapment the characters experience and the sense that their situation has no potential to change.


My storyline is inspired by the films my class have studied this year, especially City of God by Fernando Meirelles and Kàtia Lund, which depicts the struggles of growing up whilst surrounded by poverty, drugs and violence which I have tried to adopt throughout my script. Unlike City of God, which is set in Brazil, following Brazillian citizens, I have chosen to follow Alonzo and Paavo's Latino roots despite being set in New York City to further heighten the sense of alienation and the oppression immigrants tend to experience as a result of culture differences. Ideally, the target audience would already have a pre-existing appreciation for the urban story genre and understand the conventions that this genre tends to follow, regarding the portrayal of a different culture that is different from their own. By adopting Tarantino's extensive description evident throughout his scripts, I have tried to depict their socio-economic difficulty through the way in which I have described the misè-en-scene and their surroundings. My character, Alonzo, was inspired by Rocket out of City of God as his mentality was vastly different in comparison to the other characters within the film, shown through the fact that Rocket was the only character who managed to gain a job he had a passion for instantly opposing the attitudes of the general population living within the favela. I wanted to portray Alonzo as a young adolescent who is stuck in an unfortunate predicament unjustly due to his postcode and lack of money. 

In hindsight, I feel as though the depiction of my story could've been executed much clearer especially regarding the settings. Throughout my script I focused a lot on the characters and their actions in response to their surroundings however I feel as though I could've created a much clearer idea of their surroundings which would allow the reader to truly 'feel' the setting. However, I do feel as though I used particular aspects of the misè-en-scene within my script to create symbolism and connection to my intended genre. For instance, two scenes parallel each other, just as Alonzo leaves his apartment to catch his early pickup, a crowd of thugs sat upon metal trash cans make numerous racist remarks and then when Alonzo tries to run after the thug who has just shot up Paavo's shop, he notices a number of children onlooking the situation whom are also sat upon metal trash cans, mirroring the prior scene, clearly showing the way in which the lower class follow and a cycle which is almost impossible to escape. However, I still believe if I added more detail regarding the misè-en-scene and the surroundings, the position of the characters would be much clearer. Also, considering the context of my story focuses on the underclass whom are surrounded by drugs and violence, I feel as though my script would’ve been much more effective in portraying this if it were to have been set in Paavo and Alonzo’s native country. Although, by setting it in New York, I was able to portray the issue of race and immigration and the troubles immigrants deal with when attempting to integrate into a foreign community. Within my script this was particularly clear when the thugs shout “What’s up cherry picker” this snippet of dialogue clearly suggests the racism but also hones in on the specific racism that Hispanics experience as a result of their culture, because Hispanics are often limited to low paying jobs, such as picking fruit in particular cherries.


I find that the limited dialogue I chose to include worked successfully because the story isn't contained within the character’s interaction but rather the life they are trapped in ultimately found in other aspects like the misè-en-scene. I believe the lack of dialogue allowed the other aspects to speak more and create a more profound meaning achieving my intention for this script to only insert dialogue at the right moments, not just for the sake of it or just including having meaningless dialogue. The dialogue between Alonzo and Paavo, I believe, gave enough insight to their relationship, allowing readers to see the close bond between the two making the shooting even more unfortunate. By using words such as, 'Hermano' and 'Papi', popular Latino lingo, clearly showed the level of their friendship, and that they cared and respected each other. 


I attempted to adopt the cinematography style/technique often seen within urban stories however, whilst I intended to do so I don’t believe I wasn’t successful mainly due to the fact that I wasn’t too sure on how to translate it throughout my writing. Although, one reoccurring shot used within urban stories, is the fact that there is never an ‘Establishing shot’ of the city the film is set in because the director intends to bring their audience to the true nature of the city, the experiences that the underclass citizens endure day-to-day rather that the built up tourism that fabricates real social issues. Within my script, I haven’t used any famous New York landmarks as ‘Establishing shots’ or as a part of my setting, in order to distinguish audiences pre-conceptions of the city that in essence may not be true, but instead introduces Alonzo and Paavo’s experience of New York, one that is inevitably difficult. Upon reflection, I feel as though I successfully met my aims and stayed true to my intended genre. Regardless of the fact that I would've added even more detail to the misè-en-scene I do believe that my script clearly depicts the life of Alonzo and Paavo through the use of the misè-en-scene clearly adopting conventions of the Urban story genre.